Authors: Ann Speed
Published on: September 14, 2023
Impact Score: 8.12
Arxiv code: Arxiv:2309.07683
Summary
- What is new: The study assesses LLMs like GPT-3.5 with cognitive and personality measures to estimate their capabilities and stability.
- Why this is important: Concerns exist about the capabilities and power of Generative AI models, sparking debate on their implications.
- What the research proposes: A battery of tests was developed to compare the capabilities of LLMs to human benchmarks, focusing on stability and personality traits.
- Results: LLMs show no signs of sentience, with variability in responses unlike humans, and traits suggesting poor mental health if they were human.
Technical Details
Technological frameworks used: Standard, normed, and validated cognitive and personality measures
Models used: GPT 3.5
Data used: Repeated observations over a short period
Potential Impact
AI development sectors, mental health assessment tools, and potentially any sector relying on LLMs for text analysis or customer service.
Want to implement this idea in a business?
We have generated a startup concept here: AI Mental Wellness.
Leave a Reply